
There exists a photograph in Geelong Football Club's archives that feels almost quaint now. Taken in 2010, it shows a fresh faced Chris Scott standing beside club legend Gary Ablett Jr. during the coach's first preseason. Both men wear training singlets damp with sweat. Scott's expression holds the determined blankness of someone trying very hard not to appear overwhelmed. He was 34 years old then, younger than several players he'd now command. The idea that this would become the longest coaching tenure in the club's decorated history would have seemed ludicrous.
Last week, when Geelong announced Scott would lead them through 2029, completing a staggering 22 year reign, the news arrived with curious quietness. No bombastic press conference, no grand pronouncements. Just a short statement released during their annual general meeting, as matter of fact as a rainfall update. This understatement somehow feels appropriate. Scott's career has become the quiet rebuttal to modern football's most deafening tendencies.
Consider the violent pendulum swings of coaching fortunes elsewhere. Across the league, mentors are hired as saviors and discarded as scapegoats within seasons. The average AFL coaching tenure hovers around four years. Some clubs have cycled through five leaders during Scott's uninterrupted reign. Yet here stands Geelong, offering not just an extension but a philosophical declaration. In binding themselves to Scott until the latter half of the next decade, they are declaring faith in a shared language developed over decades. They are betting that continuity matters more than chasing momentary tactical trends.
Scott's dossier reads like statistical fiction. A 68% winning rate across 360 games. Finals appearances in all but two of his fifteen seasons. Two premierships separated by eleven years, bridging entirely distinct playing groups. These numbers alone would justify longevity, but they don't fully explain the emotional calculus at play. What Geelong understands perhaps better than any franchise is that Scott has become more than a tactician. He is the keeper of an institutional memory, the steward of culture across generations of players.
Remarkably, Scott will only be 53 when this contract concludes. By then, he'll likely rank fourth all time in games coached at one club, behind only titanic names like Jock McHale and Kevin Sheedy. Yet unlike those legends, Scott operates in an unrecognizable landscape. The AFL's equalization policies draft picks, salary caps, priority selections were designed explicitly to prevent dynasties like Geelong's from forming. Scott's greatest feat may be how he's weaponized stability against engineered parity.
There's quiet rebellion here. While rivals chase the dopamine hit of splashy trades or the latest wunderkind assistant coach, Geelong doubles down on the deeply unfashionable virtue of patience. They've watched Scott evolve from a fiery young strategist into something rarer, a long horizon thinker. His early teams played with kamikaze offensive flamboyance. His recent premiership sides prioritized miserly defense and ruthless efficiency. That metamorphosis required the breathing room only long term trust provides.
What does this mean for the players who will never know another senior coach? Imagine being drafted next year at eighteen, your entire professional existence shaped by one man's philosophy. There's profound psychological safety in that consistency, but also unique pressure. Scott's system demands certain sacrifices individual brilliance sublimated to structure. For every young talent who blossoms under this guidance, another might chafe against its demands. Yet the club clearly believes the trade offs are worthy. They are betting that young athletes crave certainty more than volatility.
The human dimensions resonate beyond the locker room. In regional cities like Geelong, football clubs function as civic cornerstones. Shopkeepers display team scarves year round. Grandfinal losses register as collective mourning. Scott's permanence offers psychological continuity for a community where change often arrives in painful forms factory closures, youth exodus to Melbourne. His face appears on local butcher shop signage beside specials for T bone steaks. He's become less a hired consultant than a civic monument, as fixed as the Corio Bay piers.
One wonders how this looks to other coaches staring at performance reviews after every three game losing streak. Scott's expansion mirrors the careers of NBA lifers like Gregg Popovich or football's Alex Ferguson managers whose longevity became strategic weapons. Their accumulated wisdom allowed them to see beyond quarterly results. They could bench stars in November to preserve them for April. They could endure media mockery for experimental lineups that would pay off years later. Short term coaches cannot afford such luxuries.
Yet even within this admiration, there's wisdom in noting what Scott's story isn't. It isn't a template. Many brilliant mentors lack the temperament for decades long tenures. Some clubs require disruptions. But here's what Geelong understands, in Scott Green supporters might not say but deeply feel, the best coaches are not interchangeable technicians. They are belief systems made flesh. They are tone setters whose values outlast any single game plan.
Football history remembers the comet coaches who flared brightly then vanished. But we reserve special affection for those rare figures who become synonymous with places. Geelong has chosen its synonym. When Scott finally walks away someday, decades from now, his legacy won't be measured in flags alone. It will linger in the quiet confidence of a club that stopped chasing novelty and remembered who they were. That's rare. That's worth holding onto.
By Oliver Grant